Deeper Commentary
1Ki 6:1 It happened in the four hundred and eightieth year
after the children of Israel had come out of the land of Egypt-
The difficulties in chronology with the 480 years are probably
because the periods of the judges involved some overlap between them; and
some judges may have judged one part of Israel whilst others judged another
at the same time. LXX gives the 440th year. Sometimes the Biblical record is vague, other times exact. This
reflects how God is not seeking to cover His back against critics. He is
of an altogether higher nature than that. There are times when the Spirit
uses very approximate numbers rather than exact ("about the space of four
hundred and fifty years", Acts 13:20 cp. 1 Kings 6:1). As noted on :38,
the temple was built in seven and a half years, but this is summarized as
seven years. The reference to
"seventy" in Judges 9:56 also doesn't seem exact. Seven and a half years
(2 Sam. 2:11) becomes "seven years" (1 Kings 2:11); three months and ten
days (2 Chron. 36:9) becomes "three months" (2 Kings 24:8). And 1 Kings
7:23 gives the circumference of the laver as “thirty cubits”, although it
was ten cubits broad. Taking ‘pi’ to be 3.14, it is apparent that the
circumference would have been 31.4 cubits; but the Spirit says, summing
up, “thirty”.
In the fourth year of Solomon’s reign over Israel, in the month
Ziv, which is the second month, that he began to build the house of
Yahweh-
The note in the LXX at the end of 1 Kings 5 says that the preparation
of the materials took three years. Which would mean that Solomon began the
project immediately he came to the throne, wrongly seeing the building of
the temple as some kind of proof that he was indeed the Messianic son of
David promised in 2 Sam. 7. But :37 makes it clear that
the foundations of the temple were only laid in Solomon's fourth year,
despite David having prepared everything ahead of time. Why the delay? If
we read the entire record into 1 Kings 7, the answer may be that he got
distracted with building his own house and his other building projects,
seeking to create a huge palace-temple complex where effectively the
temple was just the royal chapel which was connected to his own [double
the size] palace, by an "ascent" or magnificent ramp which the Queen of
Sheba noticed. He didn't make the temple a priority, and it was only part
of his own huge palace complex.
1Ki 6:2 The house which king Solomon built for Yahweh, its length was
sixty cubits, and its breadth twenty, and its height thirty cubits-
This was twice the size of the tabernacle.
The overall size of Solomon's temple was much larger than this 60
x 20 measurement, because of the porch, the chambers and court surrounding
it. The actual "house" wasn't that large, only 90 x 30 x 45 feet high.
Psalm 127 is prefaced with the information that it is a Psalm for Solomon- perhaps given by some nameless prophet (Gad? Nathan?) to warn him of where he was going. Verse 1 reminds him that God must be the builder of any house, or else the builders labour in vain. There is good reason to think that Solomon utterly failed to appreciate this. The records stress time and again that Solomon built the temple (1 Kings 6:2,14; 9:10,25; 10:4; 1 Chron.6:10,32; 2 Chron. 8:1,12; 9:3; Acts 7:47); yet the house referred to in the Davidic promises was to be built by God, through David's Messianic Son, the Lord Jesus. Zechariah prophesied at the time of the rebuilding of the physical temple. It is significant, in this context, that Zech. 6:12 reminds Israel that the true temple of God will be built by the Branch, the Lord Jesus. Indeed the point is laboured twice: "The man whose name is the Branch... he shall build Yahweh’s temple; even he shall build Yahweh’s temple; and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule on His throne" (Zech. 6:12,13).
1Ki 6:3 The porch before the temple of the house, twenty cubits was its
length, according to the breadth of the house. Ten cubits was its breadth
before the house-
The height of the porch was 120 cubits, or 180 feet (2 Chron. 3:4).
This is out of proportion to the length and breadth. And it
would have dwarfed the actual sanctuary (see on :2). In this case, we can
say that form eclipsed content, as always with Solomon. For the sanctuary
would have been dwarfed by the massive porch; just as is seen in Egyptian
temples, which it seems were what Solomon was imitating. But perhaps what is meant
is that the height of each of the four walls has been added together,
which would give a height of 30 cubits. This style is to be found in 2
Chron. 3:11, where the length of the wings of the cherubim is given as 20
cubits, but this was a way of saying that each of the four wings was five
cubits long. We have another example in the way that the two pillars are
said to be 18 cubits high (1 Kings 7:15), but in 2 Chron. 3:15 they are 35
cubits high. What that means is that there were two cubits of 17.5 cubits
high each, summarized as 18 cubits high in 1 Kings 7:15.
1Ki 6:4 He made windows of fixed lattice work for the house-
"Windows broad within and narrow without" (AVmg.). They were for
ventilation, not for light. There was no natural light in the temple just
as there wasn't in the tabernacle. The hope was that it would be lit by
the light of God's glory; and likewise there is no natural light in the
spiritual temple, only that of God's glory. But we could argue
that they were in fact for light; because Solomon was more interested in
natural light than in the light provided by God's glory. Yet despite this,
God by grace still sent the shekinah glory into this temple to give His
light, all the same.
1Ki 6:5 Against the wall of the house he built storeys all around, against
the walls of the house all around, both of the temple and of the oracle;
and he made side rooms all around-
The idea is that three stories (R.V.) of small chambers were built
around two sides and one end of the temple. Josephus says there were 30 of
these side rooms / chambers, which were accessed by passing through each
room, i.e. there was no corridor. These rooms are alluded to by the Lord
in Jn. 14:1-3, where He speaks of how there is a chamber or abiding place
for each of us in God's temple which He was enabling to be built by His
death. We each will have our own personal existence and place in God's
Kingdom; our personality will be preserved, and not subsumed into some
kind of nirvana. These are the chambers used for storage and even living
in Neh. 13:5; Jer. 36:10,20.
1Ki 6:6 The lowest storey was five cubits broad, and the middle was six
cubits broad, and the third was seven cubits broad-
This refers to the gap between the wall of the temple and the outer
wall of the three stories of chambers described in :5. The temple wall was
very thick at the bottom, seeing that at five cubits height there
was a kind of ledge of one cubit wide, upon which rested the floor of the
middle chambers. Then five cubits above that, there was another such ledge
upon which was put the floor of the third story; and finally at a point 15
cubits high there was another ledge to support the roof beams of the top
story. The wall of the holy place continued up for another 15 cubits, in
which there were the "windows" or, effectively, ventilation slats.
Assuming that upper wall was two cubits thick, the base of the temple wall
must have been five cubits thick. Remember that each story of the side
chambers was one cubit wider than the one below it.
For on the outside he made offsets in the wall of the house all
around, so that the supporting beams should not be inserted into the walls
of the house-
The idea is that there was no hole made in the wall of the temple or
holy place.
1Ki 6:7 The house, when it was in building, was built of stone prepared at
the quarry; and there was neither hammer nor axe nor any tool of iron
heard in the house, while it was in building-
This was perhaps an attempt to follow the spirit of the law which
commanded that no iron tool should be used in the shaping of stones for an
altar (Ex. 20:25; Dt. 27:5). But typical of Solomon, it is a getting
around of God's law; because all the same, iron tools were used in
preparing the stones. The Lord Jesus is presented as the builder of the spiritual temple, in which the stones should
fit together without strife (Eph. 2:21 alludes to 1 Kings 6:7). This means
that we as the stones are being prepared in this life; every knock and
blow we receive is intended to shape us to fit next to other stones,
eternally. And the final assembly of the stones at the day of judgment
will not be the time for shaping; that is going on now. However in
the immediate context, this is likely one of many reasons to think that
the building of the temple was in line with pagan myths about temples. For
there is evidence from various Ancient Near Eastern literature that it was
believed that human noise could repel the divine presence and drive away
the deity from the holy space. Therefore there is evidence that the images
of the idols were made away from the temple in order to preserve the quiet
sanctity of the supposed holy ground. And the Mosaic law was that no iron
tool should be used on stones used for an altar; and yet Solomon in mock
humility describes the temple as merely an altar. He sidesteps the Divine
intention- that God just wants some earth kicked together, or rough
stones. For that is the basis of our sacrifice to Him. But Solomon sought
to get around that and make a grandiose fancy altar, which God didn't
want.
1Ki 6:8 The door for the middle side rooms was in the right side of the
house: and they went up by winding stairs into the middle storey, and out
of the middle into the third-
LXX has "lowest" instead of "middle", which makes sense because
otherwise there is no way of accessing the lowest chambers. "The right
side" is Heb. 'shoulder', and refers to the face of the temple building.
1Ki 6:9 So he built the house, and finished it-
This seems to refer to the actual temple building, as the storeys of
surrounding chambers of :5 are mentioned separately as being built (:10).
And he covered the house with beams and planks of cedar-
This refers to the roof. No cedar trunk would have yielded wood long
enough to cover the required length, and so there would have been
supporting beams. The inspired record makes such good sense, and is not
open to serious criticism from a practical point of view. This roof would
have imitated the covering upon the tabernacle and would probably
therefore have been pitched at an angle.
1Ki 6:10 He built the storeys against the whole house, each five cubits
high: and they were attached to the house by cedar beams-
These beams rested on the shoulders or ledges of :6.
1Ki 6:11 The word of Yahweh came to Solomon saying-
As shown in :12, God was concerned that Solomon thought that simply
having built the temple meant that he was fulfilling the promises of 2
Sam. 7 and was therefore the promised Messianic seed. God noticed how
Solomon was bypassing in his mind the conditional nature of the promises.
1Ki 6:12 Concerning this house which you are building, if you will walk in
My statutes, and execute My ordinances, and keep all My commandments to
walk in them; then will I establish My word with you, which I spoke to
David your father-
God constantly warned Solomon about the conditionality of the promises,
before the building started (2 Sam. 7:14), during it (1 Kings 6:11-13) and
immediately after completing it (1 Kings 9:2-9). God stresses that
"you are building" this house- when His intention was that He
would build a house of people through the future Messianic seed. Solomon
struggled with the grace of all this and wanted something tangible and
physical, the work of his own hands and not God's.
Thanks to Solomon’s prayer, and if he had been obedient, all Israel would have been blessed and experienced Yahweh dwelling amongst them (1 Kings 6:12,13). Moses prayed for God to forgive Israel; and He responded: “I have pardoned, according to your word” (Num. 14:20)- rather than according to their repentance and prayer. Indeed it would seem from Heb. 11:28 that Israel were delivered from the Egyptians due to Moses’ faith in the Christ whom the sprinkled Passover blood pointed forward to. And so Israel's blessing was dependent on Solomon's obedience (1 Kings 6:12,13); their joy was because of the honour God had given Solomon (2 Chron. 7:10). The blessing of others can be dependent upon a third party (e.g. Mk. 2:5).
1Ki 6:13 I will dwell among the children of Israel, and will not forsake
My people Israel-
Yahweh's dwelling amongst Israel is therefore not predicated
upon the splendour of the temple, but upon walking in God's ways (:12). He
was aware that Solomon misunderstood this.
The Lord Jesus was well aware of the connection
between God's refusal to answer prayer and His recognition of sin in the
person praying (2 Sam. 22:42 = Ps. 2:2-5). It is emphasized time and again
that God will not forsake those who love Him (e.g. Dt. 4:31; 31:6; 1 Sam.
12:22; 1 Kings 6:13; Ps. 94:14; Is. 41:17; 42:16). Every one of these
passages must have been well known to our Lord, the word made flesh. He
knew that God forsaking Israel was a punishment for their sin (Jud. 6:13;
2 Kings 21:14; Is. 2:6; Jer. 23:33). God would forsake Israel only if they
forsook Him (Dt. 31:16,17; 2 Chron. 15:2). We can therefore conclude that
His desperate “Why have You forsaken me?” was because He was so intensely
identified with our sins that in the crisis of the cross, He indeed felt
forsaken because of sin. He did not sin, but felt like a sinner; He
thereby knows how sinners feel.
God said that He accepted the temple not so much as a place to dwell in
(as Solomon assumed it was) but as a place facilitating sacrifice, prayer
etc., for the glorification of His Name through these things; He
emphasized that He dwelt amongst
His people (1 Kings 6:13; 2
Chron. 7:12-16). There are several other places where God’s response to
Solomon’s words seems to be corrective rather than affirmatory. Thus
Solomon says that God will hear the prayers of His people because
the
temple is called by God’s Name; but God’s response is that “My
people, which are called by My Name” would pray to Him themselves and be
heard, quite apart from the temple (2 Chron. 6:33 cp. 7:14). He sees them
as bearing His Name rather than the temple building, as Solomon perceived
it. God goes on to parallel the temple and His people in 2 Chron. 7:21,22,
saying that if He punishes the temple He will punish the people. Solomon
seems to have thought that the temple would still stand favourably in
God’s eyes even if the people were punished. The record records that the
temple was “perfected” whereas Solomon’s heart wasn’t perfect [s.w.] (1
Kings 11:4 cp. 2 Chron. 8:16).
1Ki 6:14 So Solomon built the house, and finished it-
There appears no particular need for the phrase "Concerning this house
which you are in building" in :12- it appears somewhat redundant, until
we realize that God is saying 'OK I see you are building this house,
thinking you are so obedient to My word; well, get on and keep My word in
reality, and
then the promises to David will apply to you'. Activity
supposedly in God's service can lead us to think that of course we are
being obedient to His word... when the very obsession of the activity may
be blinding us to the fact that we aren't at all. There's
no record that
Solomon responded positively to God's warning words- 1 Kings 6:14 states
that "So Solomon built the house, and finished it". We are expecting to
hear Solomon respond to God- but instead, he gets on with building again.
1Ki 6:15 He built the walls of the house within with boards of cedar: from
the floor of the house to the walls of the ceiling, he covered them on the
inside with wood; and he covered the floor of the house with boards of
fir-
"Fir" is LXX "pine", which along with the huge amount of cedar would
all have been brought from Hiram.
1Ki 6:16 He built twenty cubits on the back part of the house with boards
of cedar from the floor to the ceiling: he built them for it within, for
an inner sanctuary, even for the most holy place-
"The back part", AV "sides", uses a word elsewhere describing inner
recesses, e.g. of a cave (1 Sam. 24:4) or forest (Is. 37:24). The
reference is to the 'back part' of the temple as one looked into the
temple from the entrance- which was the wall at the end of the Most Holy
Place. This was separated from the rest of the Holy Place by a door (:31)
with "chains of gold" across it (:21) and a veil across it all (2 Chron.
3:14).
1Ki 6:17 In front of the temple sanctuary was forty cubits-
The reference is to the holy place; the preceding verses have just
described the most holy place.
1Ki 6:18 There was cedar on the house within, carved with buds and open
flowers: all was cedar; there was no stone seen-
"Open flowers" means open flower buds. "Buds" is a guess at translation, for the Hebrew word is very
obscure, literally "wild gourds", a poisonous plant (s.w. 2 Kings 4:39).
It is unlikely this plant is in view. But there are observable
similarities with the decoration of Egyptian holy places. Seeing that
Solomon had married an Egyptian, and the Song of Solomon reflects
Solomon's deep admiration for things Egyptian, it seems likely that even
in the temple, Solomon allowed Gentile influence. And that was to be a
theme of this temple until its destruction. See on :29.
No wonder God told Jeremiah that He had been furiously angry
with the temple from the day it was built to the day He destroyed it.
1Ki 6:19 He prepared an inner sanctuary in the midst of the house within,
to set there the ark of the covenant of Yahweh-
"Inner sanctuary" is AV "oracle", and is the Hebrew word usually
translated "word". It refers to the most holy place, but perhaps the idea
is that God's word is ultimately where we are to find the presence of God
represented by the ark.
1Ki 6:20 Within the inner sanctuary was twenty cubits in length, and
twenty cubits in breadth, and twenty cubits in its height; and he overlaid
it with pure gold: and he covered the altar with cedar-
The idea is that within the inner sanctuary there was a space of 20
cubits length. The altar within the Most Holy was the altar of incense.
The altar is described in some manuscripts as "made" with cedar, and this
surely must be the case. It was the cedar which was overlaid with pure
gold as in Ex. 25:11.
The Outer Court was 30 cubits high, while the Holy of Holies
was 20 cubits high, about 4 meters lower. We would have expected the Holy
of Holies to be higher. But the likely reason for this was that the design
of the temple reflected that of other temples unearthed in and around the
land of Israel. They have a forecourt, an outer court, a 'holy of holies'
lower than the outer court, two large pillars [cp. Jachin and
Boaz] and some kind of large water tank [cp. the "molten sea"]; and the
king's palace adjacent.
1Ki 6:21 So Solomon overlaid the house within with pure gold: and
he drew chains of gold across before the inner sanctuary; and he overlaid
it with gold-
The most holy place, or "inner sanctuary", was separated from the
rest of the Holy Place by a door (:31) with "chains of gold" across it and
a veil across it all (2 Chron. 3:14).
1Ki 6:22 The whole house he overlaid with gold, until all the house was
finished: also the whole altar that belonged to the inner sanctuary he
overlaid with gold-
2 Chron. 3:8 says this was 600 talents of gold. One talent is 26
kilograms (57 pounds). 1 kilogram of gold is currently worth about 40,000
US$ [2020], meaning the value was around 625 million US$ in current terms.
But in the poor, subsistence farming economy of those times, this sum was
far greater in real terms. But this was not even all the gold which came
to Solomon in the course of one year (1 Kings 13:18), so it was not
particularly generous.
1Ki 6:23 In the inner sanctuary he made two cherubim of olive wood, each
ten cubits high-
"Olive" is s.w. "pine", and may also have been brought from Gentile
Hiram- to be worked into God's glory.
1Ki 6:24 Five cubits was the one wing of the cherub, and five cubits the
other wing of the cherub: from the uttermost part of the one wing to the
uttermost part of the other were ten cubits-
This means that the wings of the cherubim touched each other. There
was a complete covering over the mercy seat, or top of the ark where the
blood of atonement was sprinkled each year, and above that but below the
wings of the cherubim the shekinah glory of God was seen. The ark and
mercy seat were placed under the cherubic wings (2 Chron. 8:6). It was
only a relatively small space, as noted on :26.
In the tabernacle the wings were "spread out on high" (Ex. 25:20; 27:9), but here their wings touch each other. Although Solomon claims he built everything according to Divine revelation, we wonder whether in fact he felt free to liberally reinterpret the tabernacle features. And he changes wings uplifted to God's glory to wings which are closed in upon each other; the mercy seat, or cover of the ark, is no longer exposed to Heaven, as it were, but now closed over.
1Ki 6:25 The other cherub was ten cubits: both the cherubim were of one
measure and one form-
This "one form" is significant, as the various Biblical visions of
the cherubim seem to present them as having slightly different forms in
each vision. Like everything to do with God's glory and manifestation, the
form is constantly variable over time but expresses the same Divine glory. They stood upon their own feet in
this vision (2 Chron. 3:13).
1Ki 6:26 The height of the one cherub was ten cubits, and so was it of the
other cherub-
See on :24. The ark and mercy seat were placed under the
cherubic wings (2 Chron. 8:6).
The ark was one and a half cubits
high (Ex. 25:10) and the cherubim were ten cubits high. In this relatively
small space, the shekinah glory of God was manifest. For God doesn't need
much space in which to reveal Himself; which is an abiding principle.
1Ki 6:27 He set the cherubim within the inner house; and the wings of the
cherubim were stretched forth, so that the wing of the one touched the one
wall, and the wing of the other cherub touched the other wall; and their
wings touched one another in the midst of the house-
We note that "the wall" refers to the interior of the wall. If this
is likewise how "the walls" are described elsewhere, then the thickness of
the walls is not included in the dimensions given.
1Ki 6:28 He overlaid the cherubim with gold-
Considering the construction of the cherubim leads us to reflect that
they were not somehow supernatural, they were made of ordinary materials
and didn't fall down from Heaven, as claimed by many of the religious
cults.
1Ki 6:29 He carved all the walls of the house around with carved figures
of cherubim-
The idea was that the glory and presence of God represented by the
cherubim was not only in the most holy place, but extended beyond it.
David had often perceived this in his Psalms whilst on the run from Saul.
And palm trees and open flowers-
Perhaps the reference was to David's imagery of the righteous
flourishing like the palm tree (Ps. 92:12). But Solomon had likened his
Egyptian lover to a palm (Song 7:7,8), and the palm and open flowers
feature in Egyptian architecture. See on :18. Seeing that Solomon had
married an Egyptian, and the Song of Solomon reflects Solomon's deep
admiration for things Egyptian, it seems likely that even in the temple,
Solomon allowed Gentile influence, although mixing it with the imagery of
the cherubim of Yahweh's manifestation. And that was to be a sad theme of
this temple until its destruction.
Inside and outside-
The idea is "within and without", "the inner and outer", and I
suggest the reference is to the inner and outer areas just described, i.e.
the most holy place ['inner'] and holy place ['outer'].
1Ki 6:30 The floor of the house he overlaid with gold, inside and outside-
David had perceived that "Holiness adorns Your
house, Yahweh, forever" (Ps. 93:5).
David realized in that Psalm
that if God's throne was David's throne, then David's house was to as
Yahweh's house, adorned with holiness. Solomon interpreted this in
physical terms, adorning the temple with symbols of holiness (the
cherubim) and gold; but the real adornment was of personal holiness, which
Solomon failed in ultimately because of his obsession with the external
and material. This overlaying with gold was typical of Egyptian
temples; again we see the influence of his Egyptian wife and probably
other such wives. Overlaying a floor with gold was impractical as gold is
a soft metal; and likewise the description of an altar overlaid with cedar
wood in a place where there was no altar in the tabernacle (:20). We
therefore immediately perceive that Solomon's interest was not on
practical utility / usage, but rather on external appearance and creating
a legend that his temple was paved with gold even on the floor.
1Ki 6:31 For the entrance of the inner sanctuary he made doors of olive
wood-
The most holy place, or "inner sanctuary", was separated from the
rest of the Holy Place by a door with "chains of gold" across it (:21) and
a veil across it all (2 Chron. 3:14).
The lintel and door posts were a fifth part of the wall-
The wall was 20 cubits high, so the length and breadth of the door
posts / lintel were 4 x 4 cubits.
1Ki 6:32 So he made two doors of olive wood; and he carved on them
carvings of cherubim and palm trees and open flowers, and overlaid them
with gold; and he spread the gold on the cherubim, and on the palm trees-
"Two doors" means two leaves meeting in the middle- just as
was the recent rage at the time in Egyptian temples. Likewise the
spreading of the gold on the cherubim means that the gold was hammered and
nailed over the protruding shapes of the cherubim- again, just as in
Egyptian temples.
See on :29 for the significance of the carvings. The floors and walls were covered with gold plating, but the carved work had to be covered with gold spread or beaten onto it. Seeing gold seemed in plentiful supply, we wonder why Solomon didn't make the cherubim of solid gold. Perhaps he was careful to imitate how they had been made in the tabernacle, or perhaps it was Divinely overruled that he didn't make them of solid gold. For the significance of the stress upon overlaying with gold was that God works with very ordinary materials, wood and stone, and turns them into something far more beautiful in response to our faith, which is the real gold.
1Ki 6:33 In the same way he also made for the entrance of the temple door
posts of olive wood, out of a fourth part of the wall-
The wall was 20 cubits high, so the length and breadth of the door
posts / lintel were 5 x 5 cubits. "The entrance" in view could be that into the
holy place from the porch. "Out of a fourth part of the wall" can
be rendered simply as meaning there were four doorposts. So I suggest that
in the entrance from the Forecourt to the Outer Court there were four
doorposts of olive wood (1 Kings 6:33 Heb.). At the entrance between the
Outer Court and the Holy of Holies, there were five doorposts of olive
wood (1 Kings 6:31 Heb.). What does this signify and why is it recorded?
It's hard to say this has any meaning- until we realize that this was
typical of other temples. Thus in the elaborate stone building model from
Khirbet Qeiyafa there is exactly the same design.
1Ki 6:34 and two doors of fir wood: the two leaves of the one door were
folding, and the two leaves of the other door were folding-
This means there were four leaves. Two collapsed together on one wall
and two on the other. This meant that the opening could be just a quarter
of the entire door, or more or less the entire aperture could be opened.
1Ki 6:35 He carved cherubim and palm trees and open flowers; and he
overlaid them with gold fitted on the engraved work-
See on :29 for the significance of the carvings. 2 Chron. 3:6 adds
that the gold was from Parvaim, and that precious stones were also used.
The context is of the doors, so the idea may be that the carvings and
embossed parts of the doors were overlaid rather than the entire doors.
1Ki 6:36 He built the inner court with three courses of cut stone, and a
course of cedar beams-
This other court would be the "court of the priests" (2 Chron. 4:9),
the "higher court" of Jer. 36:10. Perhaps it was made "higher" by the
three layers of stone and the cedar decking placed upon it. Perhaps the
idea was that the people in the outer court could see what the priests
were doing. This building of a temple on a platform of three
rows of stone was, again, exactly the style of Egyptian temples.
1Ki 6:37 In the fourth year was the foundation of the house of Yahweh
laid, in the month Ziv-
This was the fourth year of Solomon's reign (:1).
1Ki 6:38 In the eleventh year, in the month Bul, which is the eighth
month, was the house finished throughout all its parts, and according to
all its fashion. Thus he was seven years in building it-
Comparing with :1, the period was seven and a half years. But as noted on
:1, the Bible is often not exact about time periods.
Previous Chapter
