New European Commentary

 

About | PDFs | Mobile formats | Word formats | Other languages | Contact Us | What is the Gospel? | Support the work | Carelinks Ministries | | The Real Christ | The Real Devil | "Bible Companion" Daily Bible reading plan


Deeper Commentary

Amos 5:1 Listen to this word which I take up for a lamentation over you, O house of Israel- "Lamentation" is literally a funeral lament. It was as if they were already dead, and now God and Amos were as it were lamenting at the funeral; although the lamentation was yet future (:16). But although the prophetic word of destruction was so certain, yet there was still space to repent. In this was the desperate urgency of the appeal Amos is making. Israel were being asked to "listen" to their own funeral lamentation. We too can try to fast forward in time and reflect what could legitimately be said about us.

Amos 5:2 The virgin of Israel has fallen; she shall rise no more. She is cast down on her land; there is no one to raise her up- But the idea of the restoration was that God would raise up Israel. So terms like "no more" and "never again" are relative to that generation, at that time; see another example in 2 Kings 24:7. This is quite normal language usage within Semitic thought, but it can cause difficulties of understanding and interpretation for more literalistic Western readers. All the same, that generation would fall and die, their bodies cast out in the open (Ez. 29:5; 32:4); and they were being asked to imagine the scene of their death and the funeral lament over them- and repent to avert that judgment. The present and past tenses are used to bring home how certain are God's words of fulfilment.


Amos 5:3 For thus says the Lord Yahweh: The city that went forth a thousand shall have a hundred left, and that which went forth one hundred shall have ten left to the house of Israel- As with the destruction of Jerusalem, there was always a remnant left. Samaria was to be left with just 10% of its former population; a major destruction. And it was with this tiny remnant that God hoped to work. They were perhaps the tenth, the tithe, which were intended for God's work. The idea of only a tenth surviving is repeated in Am. 6:10.


Amos 5:4 For thus says Yahweh to the house of Israel: Seek Me, and you will live- We are frequently reminded in the prophets that the spiritual way of life is one which is seeking God. We are to seek His face (Ps. 24:6; 27:8)- which it is impossible to behold (Ex. 33:20). Actually finding God in the ultimate sense is therefore unattainable in this life; but our whole mortal life must be lived in this spirit of seeking ultimate perfection. Seeking God is often defined in the prophets as forsaking our sins and desiring to be righteous (Amos 5:5,8,14,15). None of us are completely successful in our seeking of God in terms of quitting every sin and becoming perfect, and therefore it follows that none of is completely forsakes all our sinfulness. And yet righteousness is imputed to those who seek it, who love God's ways but like Paul in Rom. 7, allow themselves to be all too constrained by their human location. In Hebrew thought, to seek is to worship. God is worshipped by our seeking of Him. And thus the Kingdom blessing is for those who hunger and thirst to be righteous, even though they are not of themselves righteous (Mt. 5:6).

Amos 5:5 But don’t seek Bethel, nor enter into Gilgal, and don’t pass to Beersheba- Which required passing right across Judah. Judah too had her idol shrines in addition to Yahweh's temple.

For Gilgal shall surely go into captivity, and Bethel shall come to nothing- There is a word play here, as if to say "For Gilgal shall taste the gall of exile"- "Ha-Gilgal galoh yigleh". And likewise "Bethel", the house of God, "shall become an idolatry / idol house". No mention is made of Beersheba's judgment, perhaps because there appeared more hope for Judah's repentance.


Amos 5:6 Seek Yahweh, and you will live- "Seeking" God is explained on :4. 

Lest He break out like fire in the house of Joseph, and it devour, and there be no one to quench it in Bethel- Tiglath-Pileser first took into captivity all Gilead and Galilee, the majority of the territory of the ten tribes (2 Kings 10:32,33); but didn't touch the territory of the tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh, the sons of Joseph. That earlier invasion had been a warning; the outpouring of wrath upon Ephraim and Manasseh, the sons of Joseph, could yet be averted. The fire had started, but it could still be quenched by repentance. But despite the message being so clear, they refused to repent; just as we can see the writing on the wall and refuse to note it. This blindness is a sad feature of human nature.


Amos 5:7 You who turn justice to wormwood, and cast down righteousness to the earth- This is the thought of Am. 6:7 "But you have turned justice into poison, and the fruit of righteousness into bitterness". Israel's judgment was to be cast down to the earth (Is. 28:2; Dan. 8:12), and wormwood was to be their condemnation (Jer. 9:15; 23:15; Lam. 3:15). It was serving other gods which would lead to the bitterness of wormwood (s.w. Dt. 29:18). But they are condemned here not for idolatry, but for injustice, abusing the weak so that they left them with a bitter taste in their mouth, just as we feel when we have been misused or ripped off. This was the essential sin, and it was the egoism and selfishness behind that abuse which led further to idolatry. By making others feel this bitterness, by refusing to show justice / righteousness [the two ideas are closely connected in Hebrew], the abusers were securing their own condemnation when they would taste as it were the bitterness of wormwood.


Amos 5:8 Seek Him who made the Pleiades and Orion- This is emphasized because Israel are rebuked for worshipping the star of Remphan in :26 (cp. Acts 7:43). God had made not just one star but the "seven stars" (NEV "Pleiades"), all of them, and the entire constellation of stars seen in "Orion".

He who turns the shadow of death into the morning, and makes the day dark with night; who calls for the waters of the sea, and pours them out on the surface of the earth, Yahweh is His name- According to God's Name / essential character, He would reverse the creation process. Darkness would become night, and the waters of the sea, representing the armies of the invaders, would be poured out by Him upon the surface of the eretz / land promised to Abraham, just as they were at the flood. The same imagery is used in Revelation, where judgments are poured out as if from bowls / vials upon the same geographical area.


Amos 5:9 He who brings sudden destruction on the strong, so that destruction comes on the fortress- The citadel of Samaria, their human strength and defence, would be destroyed. It would be sudden, in that they had previously trusted in their various alliances. This is the nature of divine judgment- to reveal all human strength as hopelessly weak, and it is for the faithful to perceive that before judgment comes. We live in an age when such human strength has been perfected and honed as never before, with insurance against every eventuality. "The strong" refer to the group within Israel who were abusing the weak. The lesson for us is not simply regarding financial exploitation of the poor. We can all be strong in some contexts. You may be standing in line at a check out, and the person in front of you doesn't speak the local language. You suddenly become the strong, and they the weak; it is not for you to be impatient and irritated with the weak. You may be an accepted member of a family or community; and an outsider comes within the circle. You are the strong, and they the weak. 


Amos 5:10 They hate him who reproves in the gate- Perhaps a reference to Amos who stood in the gate of Samaria or Bethel delivering his warnings.

And they detest him who speaks blamelessly- Insofar as Amos spoke God's words. This detesting of Amos led to him being banned from Israel, as he records in Am. 7.


Amos 5:11 Forasmuch therefore as you trample on the poor, and take taxes of wheat from him- therefore you who have built houses of cut stone will not dwell in them. You who have planted pleasant vineyards shall not drink their wine- The taxes demanded had to be paid in kind, in agricultural produce, because the poor had nothing else to give; see on Am. 7:1. And Am. 4:6-9 has explained that this was at a time of famine. The strong took away what little food the poor had, just in order to continue their own opulent living. We live in a world where there is every opportunity to do this, and on a global scale. In time of famine, everyone had to go down a step on the ladder. But the motivation for taxing the hungry and therefore taking their little food from them was because it was unthinkable that the strong should take a step down on the ladder. And this again is a principle which cuts to the core of our society. When it comes to actually stepping down a peg and going without some aspects of our current lifestyle, all within us rebels against it. We may be generous, but only if our current level of living is not undercut. And if circumstances require us to downsize or downgrade in whatever way, it is human nature to do literally anything, at any cost to the weak, in order to save us from doing so.


Amos 5:12 For I know how many are your offences, and how great are your sins- Israel like us were tempted to think that the apparent silence of God meant that He had as it were not noticed their sins. But God is deeply sensitive, and every offence was noted and felt, and the magnitude of it. But His sensitivity never turns off. What was apparently just an on paper series of offences are described here as "your mighty sins". What we may shrug off as just surface level failure are "mighty sins" to God.

You who afflict the just- We note it was the righteous who were abused, in this case. The poor are not always "the just", for poverty is no guarantee of spirituality of itself. So it was the righteous remnant who were being abused, and God was particularly sensitive to that.

Who take a bribe, and who turn aside the needy in the courts- Is. 29:21 uses the same phrase but adds that they turned aside the needy for "a thing of nothing". The bribes they received were very small, just as Judas betrayed the Lord for a mere 30 pieces of silver, the price of a slave, that couldn't even buy more than a small parcel of muddy, useless land. Amos has made this complaint elsewhere, that even for a pair of sandals, cheap shoes, the cause of the righteous was perverted (Am. 2:6; 8:6). The allusion may be to Num. 35:31, where bribes are forbidden to cover murder. By hating their brothers and abusing them, they had effectively murdered them. And the Lord confirmed in His teaching that hatred is as murder in God's book.


Amos 5:13 Therefore a prudent person keeps silent in such a time, for it is an evil time- The reference may be to the righteous keeping silent in respect of the rightness of Divine judgments (Lev. 10:3; Ps. 39:9). The "evil time" was to come because they had themselves sought "evil" (:14). Constantly we see that the judgments which came were essentially that which they themselves sought. See on Am. 6:10.


Amos 5:14 Seek good, and not evil, that you may live; and so Yahweh, the God of Armies, will be with you, as you say- They claimed that Yahweh was with them, when He was not (Mic. 3:11). Hence they claimed to desire the day of Yahweh, when in fact it would be their condemnation (:18). The promises of the Kingdom, the comfort of God's love, are often appropriated by passive believers in times of crisis. But these promises, and the active presence of God, are to be experienced in daily life now. And this requires a seeking of good, rather than of evil. The unjust profiteers and materialists would likely have objected to the charge of actively seeking evil; but this is how God sees anything other than seeking good.


Amos 5:15 Hate evil, love good, and establish justice in the courts. It may be that Yahweh, the God of Armies, will be gracious to the remnant of Joseph- The prophets called upon men to “hate evil and love good”, to have some passion about our positions. As noted on :6, only the territory of Ephraim and Manasseh was left intact after the earlier Assyrian invasion. And if they repented, and loved good rather than evil and were just, then they could experience the grace of God's plan to save a remnant. The essence of spirituality is not achieving perfection, but loving good, loving the things of the Spirit; and therefore all who love the Lord's appearing, with all that requires, shall be saved (see on 2 Tim. 4:8).

Amos 5:16 Therefore thus says Yahweh the God of Armies, the Lord: Wailing will be in all the boulevards; and they will say in all the streets, ‘Alas! Alas!’, and they will call the farmer to mourning, and those who are skilful in lamentation to wailing- As noted on :1, it was as if the lamentation was already in progress, so certain was it that Israel would perish in the judgment to come. But that future reality could still be changed by repentance, such was and is God's sensitivity to human repentance. "The farmer" seems to be used in order to give the impression that there would be mourning from city streets to country areas.


Amos 5:17 In all vineyards there will be wailing; for I will pass through the midst of you, says Yahweh- See on :1,16. The passing through the midst in judgment is the language of God's judgment of Egypt on Passover night (Ex. 12:12). Israel had returned to Egypt in spirit and were judged accordingly, as Egypt. The wailing or funeral mourning was in the vineyards because they were symbolic of the wealthy life (:11). But those vineyards had already been smitten by the drought (Am. 4:9). They ought to have learnt the lesson, that the wealthy life and symbols of opulence were already of no meaning. But they continued in their hope that their vineyards would again flourish. We too are at times given premonitions about the meaninglessness of wealth and opulence. And if we don't take the lesson, that wealth will be removed totally at the last day.


Amos 5:18 Woe to you who desire the day of Yahweh! Why do you long for the day of Yahweh? It will be darkness for you, and not light- This and Mal. 3:1,2 warn that just desiring the coming of the Lord isn’t enough; for what end will it be, if we don’t truly love His appearing? Yet Amos goes on to say that Israel “put far away” the reality of the day of the Lord, in their minds (Am. 6:3). And yet they desired it. We can study prophecy, but not really love His appearing in seriously preparing ourselves for that day. Indeed, we can subconsciously put it far from us. When we grasp for a fleeting moment how very near is the second coming for us; can we dwell upon it, retain that intensity? Or would we rather put it “far away”? This is surely why the Lord brings the list of signs of His coming to a close with some chilling parables concerning the need for personal watchfulness. It’s as if He could foresee generations of believers straining to interpret His words carefully, correctly matching them with trends in the world... and yet missing the essential point: that we must watch and prepare ourselves for His coming, whenever it may be for us. Having given so many indicators of His soon appearing, the Lord then says that His coming will be unexpected by the believers (Mt. 24:36,44). He wasn’t saying ‘Well, you’ll never properly interpret what I’ve just said’. He meant rather: ‘OK you’ll know, more or less, when my return is imminent; but all the same, in reality it will be terribly unexpected for most of you unless you prepare yourselves. You need to make personal changes, and be watchful of yourselves; otherwise all the correct prophetic interpretation in the world is meaningless’. Those described in Rom. 1:32 know the judgment of God; they know it will come. But they have a mind “void of [an awareness of] judgment” (Rom. 1:28 AVmg.). We can know, know it all. But live with a mind and heart void of it. Tit. 1:16 AVmg. uses the same word to describe those who “profess that they know God” but are “void of judgment”. We can know Him, but have no real personal sense of judgment to come. These are sobering thoughts.

Amos 5:19 As if a man fled from a lion, and a bear met him-  The allusion may be to the idea that the lion may spare its prostrate prey, but the bear will not do so. This idea may be incorrect, but God uses it here; if they had repented to God prostrate before the invaders, then the judgment could have been averted. But they did not, and so they faced the merciless destruction of a bear.

Or he went into the house and leaned his hand on the wall, and a snake bit him- They may flee for refuge into their houses, so often criticized by Amos, but find no safety there either. Again, human wealth and strength is to be no refuge. The point is so repeated by Amos because we are so slow to accept it. See on Am. 6:9.


Amos 5:20 Won’t the day of Yahweh be darkness for you, and not light? Even very dark, and no brightness in it?- They were perhaps grabbing hold of the promises in Joel about the day of Yahweh being of bright light, a new dawn for Israel. But it would not be so for them. It's rather like an uncommitted nominally Christian person grabbing hold of words of comfort about the future Kingdom of God coming on earth; the question is, will that day be of judgment or salvation for us? The question here, rather than a simple statement, is to desperately appeal for them to imagine what judgment day would be like, and change the outcome by their repentance.


Amos 5:21 I hate, I despise your feasts, and I can’t tolerate your solemn assemblies- The feasts and related gatherings are repeatedly described as feats of Yahweh, assemblies of Yahweh. But Israel had hijacked God's religion and made His table, His feasts, their own- hence "your feasts". The New Testament likewise describes the feats as "feasts of the Jews" and Yahweh's temple as the temple of the Jews. By making the Lord's table effectively ours, we are doing the same; taking over His house as our own, with all the house rules of our denominationalism. The same language is used of God's anger at the sacrifices and feasts held in the Jerusalem temple in Judah (Is. 1:10-15). Again we see that the shrines and rituals of the calves in the ten tribe kingdom were imitations of the Jerusalem temple.


Amos 5:22 Yes, though you offer Me your burnt offerings and meal offerings, I will not accept them; neither will I regard the peace offerings of your fat animals- They had failed to appreciate what the New Testament makes apparent- that the blood of sacrifices, the performance of religious ritual of itself, was not a ground for acceptability. Rather was a contrite, repentant heart required, and the cleansing was from God's response to that rather than for the sake of the blood itself. And as noted on :21, we see that they in the ten tribe kingdom were carefully imitating the Mosaic rituals of the Jerusalem temple. But they were doing so in worship of their calves.


Amos 5:23 Take away from Me the noise of your songs! I will not listen to the music of your harps- The same language is used of how God was angry with the songs and harp music of the Jerusalem temple (Is. 1:14; 24:8; Ez. 26:13). The calf shrines of the ten tribes were imitations of the Jerusalem temple worship. They were therefore the more irritating to God.


Amos 5:24 But let justice roll on like rivers, and righteousness like a mighty stream- In Hebrew, the word for justice is that for judgment. So we have here a double meaning; God was to send judgment upon Israel like mighty rivers, and such rivers are Biblical imagery for invading armies, Assyria especially (Is. 8:6). And yet this could be averted, if the country became awash with the justice which Amos so frequently appeals for.

"Mighty stream" suggests "Ethanim", the seventh month, just before the early rains, was called Ethanim, the month of the perennial streams. Perhaps the idea is that the final Assyrian judgment was to come in this month.


Amos 5:25 Did you really bring to Me sacrifices and offerings in the wilderness for forty years, O house of Israel?- The historical record says that they did, so the idea is that although they did, God didn't accept them because they were also offering to other gods. This is a biting, incisive challenge to all of us who perform religious rituals, such as collective meetings, prayer, breaking of bread etc. We can do all these things, but not do them as God accepts. Such things are all a natural and correct part of communal life together, but they are also part of organized religion, and human nature tends to seek justification through ritual and religion rather than heartbroken faith in the God who saves by grace.


Amos 5:26 You also carried the tent of your king and the shrine of your images, the star of your god, which you made for yourselves- Right at their birth by the Red Sea, the Almighty records that "the people feared Yahweh, and believed Yahweh, and His servant Moses" (Ex. 14:23). No mention is made of the Egyptian idols they were still cuddling (we don't directly learn about them until Ez. 20). Nor do we learn that this "belief" of theirs lasted a mere three days; nor of the fact that they rejected Moses, and in their hearts turned back to Egypt. "There was no strange god" with Israel on their journey (Dt. 32:12); but there were (Am. 5:26). The reconciliation is that God counted as Israel as devoted solely to Him. The references are to Moloch [the planet Mars] and Chiun [Saturn]. Hence the emphasis that in fact God had created all the planets (:8).

Amos 5:27 Therefore will I cause you to go into captivity beyond Damascus, says Yahweh, whose name is the God of Armies- Quoted in the New Testament as "beyond Babylon", which is more relevant to Judah's captivity than that of the ten tribes to Assyria. We see here how the New Testament 'quotes' the Old Testament often with paraphrase. The idea is that the judgments upon Israel were in essence to come upon Judah; and Amos had a ministry to both Israel and Judah.