<p>11:28 <em>But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of the bread and drink of the cup- </em>We are to eat in a spirit of self examination &quot;so...&quot;, not of light hearted partying as was happening at Corinth. See on :29 <em>discern</em>.</p><p>There seems an allusion in this section to Joseph's cup of divination. The Hebrew for &ldquo;divines&quot; means literally &lsquo;to make trial&rsquo;; their taking of the cup was their trial / judgment. Thus we drink either blessing or condemnation to ourselves by taking the cup. The word used by the LXX for &ldquo;divines&quot; in Gen. 44:5 occurs in the NT account of the breaking of bread service: &lsquo;everyone should <em>examine </em>himself, and then eat the bread and drink from the cup&rsquo; (1 Cor. 11:28). The Lord examines us, as we examine ourselves. There is a mutuality here- the spirit of man is truly the candle of the Lord (Prov. 20:27). He searches us through our own self-examination. He knows all things, but there may still be methods that He uses to gather than information. Our hearts are revealed to God through our own self-examination. And is it mere co-incidence that the Hebrew words for &ldquo;divination&quot; and &ldquo;snake&quot; are virtually identical <em>nahash</em>? The snake lifted up on the pole cp. the crucified Jesus is the means of trial / divination. Through the cross, the thoughts of many hearts are revealed (Lk. 2:35), just as they will be at the last day. Thus the breaking of bread ceremony is a means towards the sort of realistic self-examination which we find so hard to achieve in normal life.</p><p>The whole story of Joseph is one of the clearest types of Jesus in the Old Testament. The way His brethren come before His throne and are graciously accepted is one of the most gripping foretastes we have of the final judgment. The rather strange way Joseph behaves towards them was surely to elicit within them a true repentance. He sought to bring them to self-knowledge through His cup. Joseph stresses to the brethren that it is through his cup that he &ldquo;divines&quot; to find out their sin. He also emphasizes that by stealing the cup they had &ldquo;done evil&quot; (Gen. 44:4,5). And yet they didn&rsquo;t actually steal the cup. The &ldquo;evil&quot; which they had done was to sell him into Egypt (Gen. 50:20). They had &ldquo;stolen&quot; him (Gen. 40:15) in the same way they had &ldquo;stolen&quot; the cup. This is why he says that &ldquo;ye&quot; (you plural, not singular, as it would have been if he was referring merely to Benjamin&rsquo;s supposed theft) had stolen it (Gen. 44:15). And the brethren in their consciences understood what Joseph was getting at- for instead of insisting that they hadn&rsquo;t stolen the cup, they admit: &ldquo;What shall we say unto my lord? What shall we speak? Or how shall we clear ourselves? God hath found out the iniquity of thy servants&quot; (Gen. 44:16). Clearly their minds were on their treatment of Joseph, the sin which they had thought would not be found out. And this was why they were <em>all </em>willing to bear the punishment of becoming bondmen, rather than reasoning that since Benjamin had apparently committed the crime, well he alone must be punished. The cup was &ldquo;found&quot; and they realized that God had &ldquo;found out&quot; their joint iniquity (Gen. 44:10,12,16). The cup was perceived by them as their &ldquo;iniquity&quot; with Joseph. They had used the very same Hebrew words years before, in telling Jacob of Joseph&rsquo;s garment: &ldquo;This have we found&hellip;&quot; (Gen. 37:32).</p><p>The cup made them realize their guilt and made them acceptive of the judgment they deserved. And it made them quit their attempts at parading their own righteousness, no matter how valid it was in the immediate context (Gen. 44:8). The cup made them realize their real status, and not just use empty words. Behold the contradiction in Gen. 44:9: &ldquo;With whomsoever of thy servants it be found, both let him die, and we also will be my Lord&rsquo;s bondmen / servants&quot;. The Hebrew words translated &ldquo;servants&quot; and &ldquo;bondmen&quot; are the same. Their mere formal recognition that they were Joseph&rsquo;s servants was to be translated into reality. Thus they say that Joseph had &ldquo;found out the iniquity of thy servants; behold, we <em>are </em>my Lord&rsquo;s servants&quot;. Describing themselves as His servants had been a mere formalism; now they wanted it in a meaningful reality. And the Lord&rsquo;s cup can do the same to us. The way they were &ldquo;searched&quot; (Gen. 44:12) from the oldest to the youngest was surely the background for how the guilty men pined away in guilt from the Lord, from the eldest to the youngest. The whole experience would have elicited self-knowledge within them. The same word is found in Zech. 1:12, describing how God Himself would search out the sin of Jerusalem.</p><p>Joseph was trying to tell them: &lsquo;What you did to the cup, you did to me. That cup is a symbol of me&rsquo;. And inevitably the mind flies to how the Lord solemnly took the cup and said that this was Him. Our attitude to those emblems is our attitude to Him. We have perhaps over-reacted against the Roman Catholic view that the wine turns into the very blood of Jesus. It doesn&rsquo;t, of course, but all the same the Lord did say that the wine <em>is</em> His blood, the bread <em>is</em> His body. Those emblems are effectively Him to us. They are symbols, but not mere symbols. If we take them with indifference, with minds focused on externalities, then this is our essential attitude to Him personally. This is why the memorial meeting ought to have an appropriate intensity about it- for it is a personal meeting with Jesus. &ldquo;Here O my Lord, I see thee face to face&quot;. If it is indeed this, then the cup will be the means of eliciting within us our own realization of sin and subsequently, of our salvation in Jesus.</p><p>Joseph&rsquo;s brothers&rsquo; words are exactly those of Daniel in Dan. 10:15-17, where in another death and resurrection experience, he feels just the same as he lays prostrate before the Angel. Our attitude to the Lord in the last day will be our attitude to Him at the breaking of bread- just as our &ldquo;boldness&quot; in prayer now will be our &ldquo;boldness&quot; in the day of judgment. In the same way as the brothers had to be reassured by Joseph of his loving acceptance, so the Lord will have to &lsquo;make us&rsquo; sit down with Him, and encourage us to enter into His joy. There will be some sort of disbelief at the extent of His grace in all those who are truly acceptable with Him (&ldquo;When saw we thee&hellip;?&quot;). The brothers grieved and were angry with themselves in the judgment presence of Joseph (Gen. 45:5)- they went through the very feelings of the rejected (cp. &ldquo;weeping and gnashing of teeth&quot; in self-hatred). And yet they were graciously accepted, until like Daniel they can eventually freely talk with their saviour Lord (Gen. 45:15). And so the sheep will feel rejected at the judgment, they will condemn themselves- in order to be saved ultimately. The same words occur in Neh. 8:10,11, when a repentant Israel standing before the judgment <em>bema </em>(LXX) are given the same assurance.</p>