Deeper Commentary
Psa 105:1
Give thanks to Yahweh! Call on His 
	  name! Make His doings known among the peoples- 
	  This is a quotation of Is. 12:8, clearly relevant to the 
	  exiles. "Call" is the word for 'declare' and alludes to Yahweh declaring 
	  His Name in Ex. 33:19; 34:5,6; cp. Dt. 32:3. What was done in such glory 
	  and majesty we are to echo in declaring His characteristics .
The language of “Give thanks to Yahweh” and “Praise Yah” is common in the Psalms, and alludes to the function of the Levites “to praise and to give thanks” (1 Chron. 16:4; Ezra 3:11; Neh. 12:24). These Psalms are inviting all God's people, all Israel, to perform the role and function of the Levites. Just as so many Christians have found themselves without a priest or pastor, and have turned to God in deep personal relationship. These Psalms were perhaps composed for the use of the exiles who were without a temple and effective Levites. Possibly they were then later used in the services of the Second Temple. David's psalm when he brought the ark to Zion (1 Chron. 16) is quoted at length in Ps. 105- and the context was that then David was acting as a priest and Levite when he was not one [being from Judah]. This is why the summary of their history doesn't mention David; and in any case, the covenant with David of eternal kingship had been brought to a reapplication now that the Davidic line of kings had ended. Ps. 106 also quotes David's psalm of 1 Chron. 16. But with a telling difference. Ps 106:47,48 concludes the psalm of Ps. 105 and Ps. 106: "Save us, Yahweh, our God, gather us from among the nations, to give thanks to Your holy name, to triumph in Your praise! Blessed be Yahweh, the God of Israel, from everlasting even to everlasting! Let all the people say, Amen. Praise Yah!". This is an appeal to "all the people" to say these words. But David's Psalm of 1 Chron. 16, which is quoted here, was written by David with his intention that it be sung by the Levites: "He appointed certain of the Levites to minister before the ark of Yahweh, and to celebrate and to thank and praise Yahweh... with harps... with cymbals... With them were Heman and Jeduthun... to give thanks to Yahweh, because His grace endures forever" (1 Chron. 16:4,5,41). But Ps. 105 and 106 ask "all the people" to sing these praises; they were now performing the function of the Levites and the temple cult which David had established.
Ps. 105 focuses upon the eternal nature of the Abrahamic covenant. Paul explains that this is the basis of the "new covenant" offered for all time. I suggest this Psalm has context within the exile and restoration from Babylon- when the prophets had offered Israel a new covenant. So these Psalms are an appeal to the exiles to recall the promises to Abraham which were the basis of that covenant. The Psalm begins and ends with reference to them (:6-11,42). They generally refused this offer of a new covenant, and sought to remain with the old covenant- although God had already broken that in response to their breaking of it. Ps. 105 presents God's faithfulness to the covenant, and Ps. 106 presents Israel's unfaithfulness in response. The point was that the old covenant was broken, but the offer of the new covenant [based upon the promises to Abraham] remained. This explains why this summary of Israel's history doesn't mention the covenant made on Sinai. Ps. 105 contains David's psalm when he brought the ark to Zion in 1 Chron. 16. But now there was no ark, and perhaps no temple on Zion. The idea surely is that the same joy and certainty expressed by David in the Abrahamic promises can be felt by others- even without any ark or "Zion". It is this realization that we can be spiritual but not religious which has been the struggle for so many over the centuries- and perhaps especially felt by those who have passed through the bubble mentality of 'denominationalism'.
This is an appeal to the Gentile "peoples" to hear about God's work and praise Him; and to praise a deity in those days meant to accept that deity. Not because they were forced to by military conquest, but because they had considered God's work which had now been told to them. 1 Chron. 16:8-22 is the Psalm written by David when the ark was brought to Zion, but it reappears within Ps. 105:1-15, which is clearly an appeal for the exiles to repent so that God's salvation history might continue with them. So we see how David's original Psalms were reworked and reapplied in later contexts, under Divine inspiration. By the time of the exiles in Babylon, it seems the ark had been lost. But such external religious symbolism was unimportant; the essence was that the people of God were to come to Zion, just as the ark had done.
David knew his sinfulness, he knew his reliance upon the grace of God, 
	  more and more as he got older. One would have thought that after the 
	  Bathsheba incident, David would have kept his mouth shut so far as telling 
	  other people how to live was concerned. But instead, we find an increasing 
	  emphasis in the Psalms (chronologically) upon David's desire to teach 
	  others of God's ways- particularly the surrounding Gentile peoples, before 
	  whom David had been disgraced over Bathsheba, not to mention from his two 
	  faced allegiance to Achish (1 Sam. 27:8-12). There is real stress upon 
	  this evangelistic fervour of David (Ps. 4:3; 18:49; 22:25,31; 35:18; 
	  40:9,10; 57:9; 62:8; 66:5,16; 95:1,8; 96:5-8,10; 100:1-4; 105:1,2; 119:27; 
	  145:5,6,12). Indeed, Ps.71:18 records the "old and greyheaded" David 
	  pleading with God not to die until he had taught "Your strength unto this 
	  generation". As with Paul years later, the only reason he wanted to stay 
	  alive was in order to witness the Gospel of grace to others. 
	  David therefore coped with his deep inner traumas by looking out of 
	  himself to those around him, eagerly desiring to share with them the 
	  pureness of God's grace. He didn't do this as some kind of self-help 
	  psychiatry; it came naturally from a realization of his own sinfulness and 
	  God's mercy, and the wonderful willingness of God to extend this 
	  to men. 
Psa 105:2
Sing to Him, sing praises to Him! Tell of all His marvellous 
	  works- 
	  David was very much involved in Israel his people. 
	  He saw himself as their representative. When he sung Psalms, he invited 
	  them to come and sing along with him (Ps. 105:2; 107:22; 111:1). And yet 
	  this can also be read as an appeal to the Gentile peoples of :1 to hear of 
	  Yahweh's works, believe them, accept Him as their God, and then in turn 
	  tell others of "His marvellous works". See on :45.
	  Psa 105:3 
	  
Glory in His holy name, let the heart of those who seek Yahweh 
	  rejoice- 
	  The Bible continually stresses the critical importance of the heart, 
	  the mind. Our minds should glory in God's Name which is His 
	  characteristics, as articulated in His "works" (:2) in history. And this 
	  leads us to "seek" Him and His face, which I suggest on :4 refers to 
	  repentance. The words here translated "seek" usually mean to 
	  worship, the outward act of visiting the sanctuary. But now 'seeking' is 
	  done in the heart; seeking here is the inward purpose of the heart.
	  
	  Psa 105:4 
	  
Seek Yahweh and His strength, seek His face forever more- 
	  To seek Yahweh's face is an idiom for repentance (Hos. 5:15), and is 
	  specifically used by Daniel in the context of the exiles (2 Chron. 7:14; 
	  Dan. 9:3). This is therefore an appeal for the exiles to repent, so that 
	  God may continue to lavish His saving grace upon them, as He had upon 
	  their forefathers. Whilst it is true that "you cannot see My face, 
	  for man may not see Me and live" (Ex. 33:20), we are commonly asked to do 
	  just this- to see God's face. Finally we are assured that we shall see His 
	  face. But we spend this life seeking to do so, seeking what is impossible 
	  to attain right now. This explains the sense we often have of feeling that 
	  we have not attained spiritually what we would like to, and what we sense 
	  is somehow possible for us. To seek God's face is what we are challenged 
	  to do when we are in sin- "I will go and return to My place, until they 
	  acknowledge their offence, and seek My face" (Hos. 5:15). We are not to 
	  just seek a quick flash view of God's face, as Moses did, but rather to 
	  seek a situation where we shall eternally see God's face. And that is the 
	  wonderful eternal future we have- not simply of eternity, but eternally 
	  beholding God's face in unclouded relationship. To see the face repeatedly 
	  means 'to be in relationship' throughout the many times the idea occurs in 
	  the Bible. Eternal life is all about relationship with God. It's why 
	  Moses' request to catch a glimpse of God's literal face was answered by 
	  the declaration of His Name, who He essentially is- because relationship 
	  with Him involves knowing Him for who He is. And that is what God wants, 
	  and it is likewise the desire of every truly spiritual mind.
	  Psa 105:5 
	  
Remember His marvellous works that He has done; His wonders, and 
	  the judgments of His mouth- 
	  The Hebrew idea of 'remembering' is not necessarily related to 
	  'remembering' as opposed to 'forgetting'; rather does it have the flavour 
	  of celebrating, and thus being aware of in gratitude and praise. 
	  The "judgments" in view are not God's laws but the Divine sentence 
	  pronounced and executed upon Pharaoh and the Egyptians (Ex. 6:6; 7:4; 
	  12:12). And yet the allusion is clearly also to the great Deuteronomic 
	  theme of 'remembering' all God's acts of grace to us personally and 
	  historically to all His people. Whereas human nature so quickly forgets 
	  acts of love and Divine grace. By contrast, God is constantly aware of 
	  [NEV "forever"]  His covenant with us (:8,42), thinking about His 
	  relationship with us all the time- whereas Israel, along with us, tend to 
	  forget it during the daily grind. We have all seen relationships like this 
	  where one party loves the other far more; that party is always thinking of 
	  the other, whilst the other is forgetful of their amazing lover and flirts 
	  with others. And this is how it is between God and His people.
	  Psa 105:6 
	  
	  
you seed of Abraham His servant, you children of Jacob, His 
	  chosen ones- 
	  
	  
	  Psa 105:7 
	  
He is Yahweh, our God; His judgments are in all the earth- 
	  The exiles were to believe the prophetic word, that all the nations 
	  in the eretz promised to Abraham were to experience God's 
	  judgments; the judgments of "our God", Yahweh, the God of Israel. 
	  And they were to perceive that despite God's apparent silence, He was 
	  working behind the scenes in the nations of the eretz to bring 
	  about the final re-establishment of His Kingdom. That is the simple point 
	  of the visions of Ezekiel and Daniel.
	  Psa 105:8 
	   
He has remembered His covenant forever, the word which He 
	  commanded to a thousand generations- 
	  Jeremiah, Zechariah, Hosea and Ezekiel point out to Judah that they 
	  had broken the old covenant; their only basis of connection with God was 
	  therefore on the basis of the new covenant He was offering, which was 
	  based upon the promises to Abraham. That word of promise was 
	  unconditional, to all who wanted to believe it. It was therefore eternal, 
	  "to a thousand generations". It would never  therefore be abrogated, unlike the 
	  old covenant based on the law of Moses. 
	  Psa 105:9 
	   
the covenant which He made with Abraham, His oath to Isaac-
	  
	  The "oath to Isaac" must refer to the repetition of the promises to 
	  Abraham to Isaac in Gen. 26:3, where the same word for "oath" is used. But 
	  the context of that repetition of the covenant oath to Isaac was in 
	  commanding him not to seek material prosperity in Egypt, but rather to 
	  remain in the famished land of Israel, then experiencing famine. This was 
	  relevant to the exiles, many of whom preferred to remain in Babylon, 
	  seeing that Malachi, Ezra and others record serious famine in the land of 
	  Judah at that time.   
	  Psa 105:10 
	  
and confirmed the same to Jacob for a statute; to Israel for an 
	  everlasting covenant- 
	  The "statute" doesn't refer to the law of Moses, but to the covenant 
	  with Abraham of :9. The covenant with Abraham was an unconditional offer 
	  of eternal inheritance of the land; all that was and is required is that 
	  this great salvation be believed. But it became and becomes a "statute" or 
	  "law" in the same way as grace reigns or is a ruler over us (Rom. 5:21). 
	  If we believe in God's unconditional covenant of salvation, then this 
	  becomes a law of our lives, the guiding principle in all our thinking, 
	  worldviews and perceptions. It is in this sense that "the grace of God... 
	  teaches us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live 
	  self-controlled, upright, and Godly lives" (Tit. 2:11,12). Grace is grace, 
	  but the wonder of it, when believed, is such that it naturally elicits 
	  changed behaviour, and in this sense is a "statute" or law.
	  Psa 105:11
saying, To you I will give the land of Canaan, the lot of your 
	  inheritance- 
	  As discussed on :10, the promise of eternal inheritance of Canaan was 
	  unconditional, by grace. It just had to be believed. This verse 
	  has been wrongly used by Christian Zionists to argue that the physical 
	  land of Israel is the eternal possession of Jews and therefore they have a 
	  right to it now. But we must remember that the New Testament labours the 
	  point that the promises to Abraham were not fulfilled to God's people; 
	  even when Jews lived in the land in Old Testament times, it had not been 
	  given to them in the terms of the Abrahamic covenant. Heb. 11:39,40 is 
	  clear that even the faithful amongst Israel died in faith without having 
	  received the Abrahamic promises- even though they lived in the land. Even 
	  the patriarchs had to buy part of the land as a burial plot. The 
	  fulfilment of the promises will be in the future, in the eternal Kingdom 
	  of God on earth under the Lord Jesus. It is not now.
	  Psa 105:12 
	  
when they were but a few men in number, yes, very few, and 
	  foreigners in it- 
	  God rejoices to work with the small and feeble. The "few men" must 
	  refer to how Jacob's family only numbered about 70 people when they went 
	  into Egypt. The same phrase "few men in number" is exactly that used by 
	  Jacob in lamenting how very small his tribe was compared to the aggressive 
	  tribes amongst whom they lived in Canaan (Gen. 34:30). And it is the 
	  phrase used of how when Israel were to be judged for their sins in exile, 
	  they would be left "few men in number" (Dt. 4:27). The exiles are being 
	  encouraged to see the similarities between them and Jacob's family in 
	  Egypt, the original 'Israel' at its first beginnings.
	  Psa 105:13 
	   
They went about from nation to nation, from one kingdom to 
	  another people- 
	  This seems to refer, in the context, to the journeyings of the 
	  patriarchs amongst the peoples of Canaan, Philistia and Egypt. Although 
	  they suffered at the hands of those peoples, they were miraculously 
	  preserved; and so would God's people be despite their current exile in 
	  Babylon / Persia. Their journeying to the land of the Philistines 
	  and Egypt were wrong and from their own weakness. Yet the wonder is that 
	  God guided them through those journeys too.
	  Psa 105:14 
	   
He allowed no one to do them wrong. Yes, He reproved kings for 
	  their sakes- 
	  In this we see God's absolute grace. For both Abraham and Isaac were 
	  rightly reproved by the Abimelech kings for lying about their wives, and 
	  yet God reproved those kings. He was openly showing His passionate love and 
	  preference for His people; they were rightly reproved by the kings (Gen. 
	  20:16), but those kings were reproved by God for their sins of ignorance. 
	  And it was this same grace which was available to the exiles. "Wrong" was 
	  indeed done to the exiles (s.w. Jer. 50:33; Hos. 5:11), as it was done to 
	  the historical Jacob; but the point is being made that it was not 
	  ultimately allowed because there was the final restoration of Jacob's 
	  fortunes, as there would be ultimately for God's people- but in God's own 
	  way and time.  
	  Psa 105:15 
	  
Don’t touch my anointed ones! Do my prophets no harm!- 
	  This refers to how Abraham and Isaac were not harmed despite lying to 
	  Abimelech (see on :14). It definitely doesn't mean that God's visible 
	  public servants are beyond criticism;
	  for Abraham and Isaac most definitely are reproved for their actions 
	  in the Biblical record. The point is that they, weak as they were and 
	  deserving of "harm", were preserved from ultimate harm by God's grace. And 
	  they are cited as an example to the exiles, who were all "anointed ones" 
	  (Lam. 4:21), they had a special purpose before God; just as all in Christ, 
	  the anointed one, are likewise "anointed ones"  (2 Cor. 1:21). So 
	  this doesn't give pastors or church leaders special privilege of being 
	  beyond criticism, as this verse is misused to teach.
	  
	  Psa 105:16 
	  
He called for a famine on the land, He destroyed the piles of 
	  food- 
	  This verse must be understood in its context within this 
	  chronological account of God's grace towards His people at the time of the 
	  patriarchs. The Joseph story begins in the next verse, and so we are to 
	  understand that God gave a prophetic word about the famine before 
	  Joseph was sold into Egypt (:17). This theme is continued in :19; God made 
	  a prophetic word about Joseph, but it took time to come to fulfilment. And 
	  during that time, he suffered. But although God foresaw the time of 
	  famine, He had made plans right from the start of it to also save His 
	  people from it- even it involved factoring in their sinfulness within 
	  those plans. This was exactly the situation with the exiles; God's word 
	  had sent them into captivity, but that word had also arranged a salvation 
	  from it, even though they were suffering whilst that was brought about.
	  God's plan of a famine and for Israel to be in Egypt was made by 
	  Him before Joseph was sold into Egypt.
	  Psa 105:17 
	  
      
He sent a man before them- Joseph, who was sold for a slave-
	  
	  See on :16. In the  context of the Psalm, God is comforting Israel that all their sufferings had  been experienced by Joseph. 
	  The exiles are often spoken of as being in  prison in a Gentile world (Ps. 79:11; 102:20; Is. 42:7,22; 49:9); just as  Joseph was. Prison and death are often associated because a spell in prison was  effectively a death sentence, so bad were the conditions. Israel being in prison  is therefore a symbol of a living death. 
	  The Lord Jesus as the suffering servant experienced all the sufferings of 
	  the exiled people of God, as their representative. On the cross, the Lord 
	  Jesus Christ was the great,  supreme prisoner (Ps. 69:33- this is an intensive plural, referring to a  singular great prisoner). Like Joseph, He went through all the emotions of the  prisoner; the shame, depression, introspection. As Israel were comforted in  their living death by the fact that there was an individual in the past who had  gone through all they were going through as a group; so the new Israel ought to  take comfort together in contemplating the experiences of 
	  the Lord Jesus. He bore our communal sorrows, griefs and sins. In 
	  this sense He was "sent before" both the exiles and ourselves. 
      
The amazing thing is that God "sent" Joseph 
	  to Egypt, but his brothers "sold" him there. They sold, but God sent: "you 
	  sold me here, for God sent me" )Gen. 45:5). He himself makes this point to 
	  them. Whatever men do to us, it is of God and in fact part of His wider, 
	  saving purpose.
      
	  Psa 105:18 
They bruised his feet with shackles; his soul was locked in 
	  iron- 
	  This highlights the mental aspects of 
	  Joseph's suffering. The verse is badly translated in the AV: "Whose feet 
	  (the same word is translated ability, endurance, journey) they hurt (Heb. 
	  'to browbeat or depress') with fetters: (i.e.) his soul (AVmg.) came into 
	  iron". His very soul was in iron, trapped, oppressively boxed in as he 
	  lay in the darkness. As the Lord Jesus Christ hung in the darkness He too was depressed 
	  by the weight of His mental burden, a burden so great it must have pushed 
	  His brain to maximum neurological capacity. The spirit of the crucified 
	  Christ is also in Ps. 142:7: "Bring my soul out of prison... the righteous 
	  shall compass me about" (cp. Ps. 22:22). The Lord Jesus poured out His soul unto 
	  death; "He was taken away by distress" (Is. 53:12,8 AVmg.) suggests that 
	  it was the mental crisis in the Lord's heart on the cross which 
	  resulted in His death. This is why Pilate marvelled that He died so 
	  quickly. It is evident from this that the physical process of crucifixion 
	  did not kill the Lord, but rather the heart burst (both figurative and 
	  literal) which it brought upon Him. Do we not sense that striving in our 
	  minds as we fellowship His sufferings? Here is the challenge of the Joseph  record and seeing Joseph as a type of Christ; to just begin to capture the  mental anguish of the Son of God as He hung there.
Psa 105:19
until the time that His word came true, and Yahweh’s word 
	  proved Him true- 
We could read this "His word" as referring to Joseph's word, which 
	  was also God's word.
Just as the prophetic word for Joseph came true when it appeared at times 
	  to have no chance of fulfilment, so the word of restoration would come 
	  true for the exiles. See on :16. God has arranged our lives according to a pattern; we 
	  have specific times in our lives for various situations. Looking back at 
	  the Biblical record of Joseph and Moses, whose life was divided clearly 
	  into three periods of 40 years, we see this clearly; but it’s of course 
	  harder to discern in our own lives as we are still living through it. But 
	  God is in control and has a plan for us, desiring only our eternal good in 
	  our latter end. Joseph was in this situation until the 
determined time came for God to suddenly deliver him thanks to the unexpected 
word from a king; and so Judah, depressed in Babylon, were being comforted that 
when the predicted 70 years captivity were ended, they too would be likewise 
delivered- which came true in the decree of king Cyrus for them to return to 
their land with his every blessing.
	  
	  Psa 105:20 
	  
	  
The king sent and freed him; even the ruler of peoples, and let 
him go free- 
	  The deliverance of 
Joseph by the edict of a powerful king looked forward to the deliverance of the 
captives by the decree of Cyrus. Pharaoh's behaviour is recorded in terms 
	  appropriate to Cyrus, e.g. describing him as "ruler of peoples". "Freed" 
	  is AV "loosed" (s.w. Ps. 146:7). The exiles were prisoners who could have 
	  been loosed from Babylon- had they wished. The book of Esther makes clear 
	  that the Jews were far from impoverished prisoners. The imagery of being 
	  in prison and slavery is therefore in spiritual terms; and most of the 
	  exiles refused that great deliverance because they didn't perceive their 
	  condition. And that's exactly why folks today turn down the great offer of 
	  freedom made to them in Christ.
	  Psa 105:21 
He made him lord of his house, and ruler of all 
	  of his possessions- 
	  As explained on :22, this could imply that such a situation was 
	  potentially possible at the time of the restoration under Cyrus. The 
	  allusion to Joseph continues; he was in a prison "house" under a "lord" 
	  (Gen. 39:2; 40:7), but there was a sudden, radical inversion of 
	  everything. He was exalted from that position to be lord of Pharaoh's 
	  "house" (Gen. 45:8). This sudden inversion could potentially have happened 
	  with the decree of Cyrus.
	  Psa 105:22 
to discipline his princes at his pleasure, and 
	  to teach his elders wisdom- 
	  "Discipline" is AV "bind" and maybe continues the theme of :21, of 
	  sudden inversion. Instead of being bound by princes, Joseph bound princes. 
	  This isn't recorded of Pharaoh and Joseph; but I have suggested in 
	  commentary on the Joseph story that there are hints that the worship of 
	  Yahweh and the acceptance of His principles was established by Joseph at a 
	  high level in Egypt. Perhaps the idea is that potentially, Cyrus could 
	  have allowed a Joseph figure at the time of the restoration to teach the 
	  entire Persian leadership of Yahweh's wisdom. And thus the Kingdom of God 
	  would have spread throughout the entire eretz promised to Abraham.
	  But these things were precluded by Judah's impenitence, no such 
	  Joseph figure arising, and Cyrus also failing to live up to his potential. 
	  All these things come to their reapplied fulfilment in the Lord Jesus and 
	  the things of His Kingdom. 
	  Psa 105:23 
Israel also came into Egypt, Jacob lived in the 
	  land of Ham- 
	  The force of "also" is that as the exiles had gone into Babylon, so 
	  also had Israel gone into Egypt, and been blessed there and delivered from 
	  it.
	  Psa 105:24 
He increased his people greatly, and made them 
	  stronger than their adversaries- 
	  The hope was that a small minority nation like Judah could have 
	  become stronger than "Babylon" and arisen from their exile in supernatural 
	  strength given by God. But the majority of them preferred to remain there, 
	  and initially, as Ezekiel laments, they worshipped the gods of Babylon. 
	  This is also hinted at in the book of Esther.
	  Psa 105:25 
He turned their heart to hate His people, to 
	  conspire against His servants- 
	  This is further evidence that God can work directly upon the hearts 
	  of people, including those like the Egyptians who are not His people. The 
	  heart of Saul was likewise turned (s.w. 1 Sam. 10:9). This is effected 
	  today by the work of the Holy Spirit directly upon human spirits / hearts.
	  The same word is used in :29 of how water was turned to blood; and 
	  of how Saul was "turned" into another man, and was "given another heart" 
	  (1 Sam. 10:6,9). Is. 60:5 uses it of God converting men unto Himself.
	  
	  Psa 105:26 
He sent Moses His servant, and Aaron whom He 
	  had chosen- 
	  The phrase "chosen... servant" is used of David (Ps. 78:70). But it 
	  is particularly used of the people of God whilst exiled (Is. 41:8,9; 
	  43:10; 44:1 etc.), and of Zerubbabel, the potential Messiah at the time of 
	  the restoration (Hag. 2:23). Zerubbabel could have been David 
	  redivivus, a Messiah figure who was the Davidic ruler, representative 
	  of God's people, who were also the chosen servant. Just as Moses and Aaron 
	  had delivered the people from Egypt, so this individual could have 
	  delivered the exiles from Babylon and led them to a restored Kingdom of 
	  God in the land. But he failed, as did the people; and so these things 
	  were reapplied to the ultimate "chosen servant", the Lord Jesus (Mt. 
	  12:18).
	  Psa 105:27
They performed miracles among them, and wonders 
	  in the land of Ham- 
	  Mizraim or Egypt was the descendant of Ham (Gen. 10:6; Ps. 105:23,27; 
	  106:22). There may be an allusion to Khem, one of the main Egyptian gods. 
	  For the purpose of all the plagues was to demonstrate that Yahweh was the 
	  only God, and the Egyptian gods had no real existence. The "signs" 
	  performed by Moses and Aaron (:26) could have been matched by the "signs" 
	  performed by the two "men of sign" at the restoration (Zech. 3:8).
	  Psa 105:28 
He sent darkness, and made it dark. They didn’t rebel against 
	  His words- 
	  
	  
	  
He turned their waters into blood, and killed their fish-
The miracles upon the waters were in a sense repeated upon Babylon when the waters were dried up from around the city so that the Medes could take the city. This admittedly was not by miraculous means; but perhaps the idea is that potentially, there could have been similar miraculous acts to cause Babylon to fall and enable the exodus of the exiles.
Psa 105:30
Their land swarmed with frogs, even in the rooms of their kings-
Potentially, there could have been similar miraculous acts to cause Babylon to fall and enable the exodus of the exiles. The descriptions of the fall of Babylon never came about as was potentially possible. Babylon decayed rather than being struck with the supernatural plagues envisioned in the "fall of Babylon" prophecies; they will come true in the last days, however, for they are alluded to in Rev. 18.
Psa 105:31
He spoke, and swarms of beetles came, and lice in all their borders-
As noted on :28, the plagues came about by the word of Yahweh, alluding to His creative words which brought about creation in the first place. The same prophetic word had been spoken about the restoration and recreation of God's Kingdom in the land.
Psa 105:32
He gave them hail for rain, with lightning in their land-
Hail and lightning (AV "flaming fire") are the words used for the destruction of Assyria / Babylon (Is. 30:30). They are also associated with theophany (Ps. 18:12,13). Hail and lightning could have been used to destroy Babylon and thereby fulfil God's prophetic word of restoration for the exiles (Ps. 148:8). But these great potentials were not realized because the Jews didn't repent and didn't for the most part actually want the restoration of the Kingdom. They preferred the good life in Persia.
Psa 105:33
He struck their vines and also their fig trees, and shattered the trees of their country-
Not recorded in the Exodus record. The language of vines and figs is more relevant to Babylon (Is. 36:17) rather than Egypt; but the plagues upon Egypt are being described as being potentially possible upon Babylon, if Judah repented and really wanted restoration. We therefore read of Babylon's latter day plagues (Jer. 50:13; Rev. 18:4,8). These things have been reapplied to Babylon of the last days seeing they didn't happen as potentially possible at the restoration.
Psa 105:34
He spoke, and the locusts came, and the grasshoppers without number-
As noted on :28,31, the plagues came about by the word of Yahweh, alluding to His creative words which brought about creation in the first place. The same prophetic word had been spoken about the restoration and recreation of God's Kingdom in the land. The language of creation is used about the destruction of Babylon; because the idea was that the fall of Babylon would presage the new creation of God's people and land. But this was conditional upon their repentance. Because they didn't repent and preferred Babylon, Babylon didn't therefore fall at the time in the dramatic way which the prophecies show was potentially possible.
Psa 105:35
ate up every plant in their land and devoured the fruit of their ground-
The prophets envisage the fall of Babylon meaning that her land would be damaged by supernatural visitation. But Babylon fell slowly, the prophetic picture didn't come about at the time of the restoration, but is reinterpreted to the latter day Babylon; see on :34.
Psa 105:36
He struck also all the firstborn in their land, the first fruits of all their manhood-
The death of the firstborn was because either the individuals or their parents refused to be obedient to God's offer of salvation. It was therefore a result of human sin; and part of "sin" is that it hurts others. "The chief of all their strength" (AV) is another way of saying 'the firstborn' (s.w. Gen. 49:3). The idea is that human strength was to be taken away, because Egypt was not trusting in God's strength. But God did the same to His own "strength", His people (Ps. 78:61).
Psa 105:37
He brought them forth with silver and gold, there was not one feeble person among His tribes-
Amazingly, there was nobody sick amongst the three million or so who left Egypt that night. At our exodus from this world through our Red Sea baptism into Christ, we are made spiritually strong- and must abide in that strength. "There was not one feeble person among His tribes" (Ps. 105:37), but prior to this the Israelites had indeed been "feeble" before their Egyptian captors (s.w. Ps. 107:12). This means that the feeble were made strong; and this was exactly the promise to the exiles, that they who were "feeble" in Babylonian exile would be strengthened so that they could leave Babylon and be restored to the land (s.w. Is. 35:3). The word for "feeble" is often translated "cast down" and is used of how Judah had been at the time of their exile into Babylon (Jer. 6:21; 8:12; 18:15; Lam. 1:14; Hos. 5:5 and often). But they would be led out of Babylon in a straight way and without stumbling / being feeble (s.w. Jer. 31:9); the "feeble" would be strengthened (Zech. 12:8 s.w.). Yet when they returned to the land, they were "feeble" (s.w. Neh. 4:10 "decayed"; Mal. 2:8 "stumbled"). The potential strengthening wasn't used by them. It was a psychological strengthening that they were given; their heart had been brought down with labour and therefore they were "feeble" (Ps. 107:12 s.w.); but there was none "feeble" as they crossed the Red Sea. It speaks directly of the same spiritual strengthening given in the birth of the Spirit after having crossed the Red Sea [= water baptism].
Psa 105:38
Egypt was glad when they departed, for the fear of them had fallen on them-
"Glad" is a word nearly always used of rejoicing "before the Lord", of a spiritual nature; it has been used in :3 of God's people rejoicing in His Name. The word is used of rejoicing along with God's people in Ps. 106:5. The fear which fell upon Egypt may simply be a reference to that of Ex. 15:16. But fear falling upon people is the phrase used of what happened in Persia when the Jews were exalted (Esther 8:17; 9:2,3), with the result that many became Jews. So the idea may be that many in Egypt accepted the God of Israel after the Hebrews departed; and this was the envisaged outcome in Babylon too. But the potential was marred by the fact that Judah didn't give glory to God, remained for the most part in Persia / Babylon, and therefore the intended repentance of Babylon didn't happen.
Psa 105:39
He spread a cloud for a covering, fire to give light in the night-
The sensitivity of God is revealed here. The cloud kept the heat of the sun off them in the day time, and the fire kept them warm at night when the temperatures plunged in the desert. This same care was potentially available to the exiles (Ps. 121:6); but most didn't even want to make the journey, and remained in Babylon. These promises are therefore reapplied to the new Israel (Rev. 7:16), As Yahweh provided a pillar of fire to give light in the night to His people in the wilderness, so Israel were to arrange for a fire to be burning throughout the night in the tabernacle. They were to give light in response to God’s giving light to them.
	  Psa 105:40 
They asked, and He brought quails, and 
	  satisfied them with the bread of the sky- 
	  
	  Psa 105:41 
He opened the rock- 
	  As the rock was "opened", so Babylon, the apparently invincible 
	  prison house, would be opened for the exiles (s.w. Is. 14:17; 45:1); the 
	  graves would be opened and the dry bones of the exiles would come forth to 
	  restore the Kingdom (s.w. Ez. 37:13).  
And waters gushed out; they ran as a river in 
	  the dry places- 
	  The language of Is. 41:18; 45:8 about what God would do for the 
	  returning exiles. In the restored Zion, a fountain would be "opened" (s.w. 
	  Zech. 13:1). But all this was precluded  by the exiles refusing to 
	  rebuild Zion according to the specifications in Ez. 40-48. 
	  Psa 105:42 
For He remembered His holy word, and Abraham 
	  His servant- 
	  
	  Psa 105:43 
He brought forth His people with joy, His 
	  chosen with singing- 
	  
	  Psa 105:44 
He gave them the lands of the nations. They 
	  took the labour of the peoples in possession- 
	  
	  Psa 105:45 
that they might keep His statutes, and observe His laws. Praise 
	  Yah!- 
	  
It has been observed: "Psalm 105 celebrates what God has done and Psalm 106 highlights what the people have not done".
 Previous Chapte
 Previous Chapte